Courtroom from Appeals off Kansas,3rd Area, Seneca Condition

No. 13-08-16.

<>Defendant-appellant, Jay J. Jones, appeals from the judgment of the Seneca County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, ordering him to pay plaintiff-appellee, Evelyn Jones, $8,, plus statutory interest from , court costs incurred, and $2,000 of Evelyn’s reasonable attorney fees. On appeal, Jay argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, that the trial court erred in finding for Evelyn as she failed to present sufficient evidence of unjust enrichment to meet her burden of proof, that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party, and that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and costs to Evelyn without a presentation of evidence on the issue. Based on the following, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.

JONES v. JONES

<>In December 1999, Evelyn filed a petition for dissolution of her marriage to Jay in the Seneca County Court of Common Pleas, a petition that incorporated a separation agreement. During the course of the marriage, the parties had purchased a business called the Whippy Dip, for which they took out a line of credit (home equity loan) on their residence at 628 Northview Dr., Fostoria, Ohio (the residence), to help pay expenses of the business.

New functions agree totally that Spouse will stay in our home and you can shall be accountable for all of the mortgage repayments, tools, taxes, insurance rates, and you can fix towards said home * * * and shall hold Spouse harmless thereof. * * *

That real estate is even mortgaged inside 1999 on good loan out of Husband’s to have his Whippy Drop company, the latest activities then consent below:

B. Partner should build fast costs in order to Trick Bank otherwise their successor, into Whippy Drop financial, on which the subject property over is additionally pledged due to the fact collateral.

The newest events are also the owners of a house and you can providers found at 400 S. Main St., Fostoria, Seneca State, Ohio, referred to as Whippy Drop. * * *

The fresh activities concur that Spouse should retain the told you a residential property and you may Whippy Drop business and you will will be guilty of all home loan repayments, resources, taxation, insurance policies, and you will repair with the said a home and company instantaneously up on signing of this contract, and will keep Spouse harmless thereof.

<>In , Evelyn filed a motion for contempt, or, in the alternative, a complaint for unjust enrichment, alleging that when she sold the residence, she was forced to pay off the remainder of the home equity loan for the Whippy Dip, which was Jay’s sole responsibility under the separation agreement, and that Jay refused to reimburse her for this payment.

<>In , Jay filed a motion to dismiss Evelyn’s complaint for unjust enrichment and motion for contempt on the grounds loans in Irondale that Evelyn failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted, that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the action, and that Evelyn failed to join an indispensable third party, Key Bank.

<>In , the magistrate dismissed Evelyn’s motion for contempt, but found that her complaint for unjust enrichment properly stated a claim, that the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to enforce the separation agreement, and that Key Bank was not an indispensable party to the action.

<>Lou Ann Fleming, a relationship manager with Key Bank, testified that Jay had three loans that involved the Whippy Dip business. One loan was taken out on March 2, 1999, for $28,, secured by the real estate on which the Whippy Dip was located, another on March 2, 1999, for $55,, secured by 699 shares of Quest Communications Stock, and a third loan on February 8, 1999, that was a home equity line of credit for $44,000, secured by the residence; that two loans were dispersed from the home equity line of credit in e was not on the , Key Bank subordinated the home equity loan to a loan from Old Fort Bank. She continued that a title company contacted her to find out what amount was owed on the home equity line of credit because Evelyn wanted to the sell the residence and was required to pay off this loan before selling, but that she told the title company she was required to get Jay’s permission before releasing the payoff figures because Evelyn was not on the loan.

Happy Nugget step 1 Deposit Claim 40 FS Incentive Just for step 1

September 19, 2024

پارس یدک

BLOG

No. 13-08-16.

JONES v. JONES

LEAVE A COMMENT

ONLINE APPOINTMENT

LATEST POSTS

MOST VIEWED

TEXT WIDGET

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

TAGS

درباره ما

محصولات ما

برچسب های محبوب

ساعات کاری

اینستاگرام